The Galactic Center

Key points: How the Galactic Center was hidden; evidence for a black hole AND for recent star formation; the circumnuclear ring

Why is it important

Conditions for star formation and evolution must be very different in the centers of galaxies. If we lived in the center of a galaxy, there would be a million stars between us and another star at 1 parsec distance such as alpha Centaurus. In our actual position, alpha Centaurus is the closest star. This huge density of stars may cause peculiar things to happen to them as they form and evolve. In addition, centers of galaxies harbor ultramassive (up to a billion M) black holes that we see as quasars or bright radio galaxies, exotic objects that make huge amounts of energy. Conditions around them must be so extreme, they test our laws of physics.

In the nearest galaxies, the highest resolution pictures we have taken show details only down to 10 to 30 light years. With perhaps 100,000,000 stars lumped together, we can barely see even the brightest individual stars. Also, we cannot study what happens really close to any possible black hole.

The center of the Milky Way is 100 times closer than the next closest galactic nucleus, so we can take pictures showing details 0.03 light years in size. This "cosmic zoom lens" makes the Galactic Center have an importance for galaxy studies similar to the importance of the sun for stellar work.

However, extinction makes the Galactic Center inaccessible to visible-light astronomy. It was located approximately by radio measurements, then definitively in the starlight at 2 microns.

Spectra show many of the brightest sources are normal red supergiants. There is a tail of excited gas being blown out of the brightest cool star (IRS 7) (from Yusef-Zadeh and Melia). This indicates it lies near the unique cluster of hot blue stars and therefore lies in the Galactic Center. As a result, we conclude we are seeing the normal stages of evolution of massive stars. Stars must have formed in the Galactic Center in the last 10 million years, since that is how long it would take to evolve to the red supergiant.

The members of the cluster of blue stars are also very massive -- more than 30 solar masses -- and hence very young. They are close to the supernova stage. They contribute to the energy but are not hot enough to provide it all -- the main sequence blue stars (at or below our current detection limit) are hotter and make more energy despite their faintness in the near infrared.

So, we have had to conclude that the energy comes from young, hot stars, most of which we do not see but can deduce are there from indirect arguments.

Could there still be a black hole?????

Even if it doesn't make much energy, it turns out there is a black hole right in the center. After 20 years of controversy, we finally managed to measure enough velocities of stars to measure the gravitational field accurately.

This series of images shows the stars moving very rapidly (~1000 km/sec) in their orbits around the position of Sgr A* (the small yellow cross). On this scale, its motion would be imperceptibly small, so this animation demonstrates that it is truly undetected - there is no source to be seen under the yellow cross. The data were obtained over about a decade.

from MPE infrared group, http://www.mpe.mpg.de/www_ir/GC/gc.html

If we zoom in on Sgr A*, we see better the very high speeds of the stars that come very close. There is no trace of the central black hole, though, other than the effect of its mass on the stellar orbits.

Why is the black hole so dim?

Ever increasing resolution showed the black hole is not the energy source. The brightest source in the very high resolution near infrared image to the right is IRS 7, a red supergiant that puts out most of its energy in the near infrared (and the star with the gas tail we showed earlier). The other bright stars are also very young and massive. The blue-appearing ones in the center of the image are a unique clustering of very luminous, massive stars. The black hole is invisible. (image from Gemini Project)

This image is about four times larger than the starting point for the animation above.

If the black hole dominated the energy of the Galactic Center, it would be the second brightest source in the infrared image. Instead, it is invisible.

Here is a very deep, high resolution (1 arcsec) X-ray image of the Galactic Center -- the source elongated up and down just above and to the right of the center is Sgr A*, but it doesn't stand out at all. Even in X-rays, where we look to find stellar black holes, there is nothing to draw our attention to the supermassive black hole here!(from NASA/CXC/MIT/F.K.Baganoff et al. http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2003/0203long/index.html)

Except that occasionally something falls onto the accretion disk and causes a bright flare-up (http://chandra.harvard.edu/resources/animations/blackholes.html?page=3)

The biggest flares we have seen correspond to a Mercury-sized object getting swallowed up! http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2007/gcle/

A much bigger flare may have occurred 500 years ago, when briefly we might have had an active galactic nucleus (discussed on the next page)!

http://m.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27159/

However, we can see the black hole faintly in the radio!

Animation zooming in on the Galactic Center black hole

Starting from a large scale radio image, let's zoom in on Sgr A*. We start with a view about 2 parsecs across; if we put the sun at the center, the nearest star would be near the edge, but in the Galactic Center the frame is filled with millions of stars (none of which can be seen in the radio image). We zoom in by a factor of about 1,000 to see the Sgr A* radio source just barely resolved by our highest resolution radio measurements. animation from Melia, Falcke, and Agol

The lack of energy from the Galactic Center black hole has turned out to be a major challenge to our theories of black holes. We think that the matter surrounding the black hole in the Galactic Center is very hot and in a sphere rather than a disk, and virtually transparent to its own radiation so it does not heat up efficiently. The energy is not emitted in the X-ray, but is carried inward by the flow of matter toward the event horizon.

What is happening with the interstellar gas? What stopped the black hole from having access to lots of matter to generate energy?

Here is a radio image of the central 5 x 5 parsecs of the Milky Way. Sgr A* is near the center of the bright, complex source to the right. Because of its appearance, this structure is called the "minispiral." Sgr A* is not clearly visible on this image, which emphasizes much larger structures. (from http://www.astro.utu.fi/~cflynn/galdyn/l13.html)

map in the HCN line shows the circumnuclear ring

Here is an image in the emission of the HCN molecule, shown in yellow and orange. We see a ring of molecular material (diameter about 2 parsecs) surrounding the black hole. It is shown here imaged in a radio molecular emission line, but it shows up in other ways too. The minispiral is superimposed in blue contours. It appears to be filaments of gas falling inward from the molecular ring.

The center of the molecular ring is filled with young stars. Why did these stars form, rather than the material falling into the black hole and making it a bright source? We do not know the answer for sure.

Mixtec personification of the Milky Way, from http://garnet.acns.fsu.edu/~dco2511/

Marvel Quasar Comic, http://www.coincidental.net/comics/series/quasar/1-033.html

Click to return to syllabus

Click to return to the Type of the Milky Way

hypertext G. H. Rieke

Click to go to the Active Galactic Nuclei

	The central few hundred parsecs in visible light: the view is dominated by thick obscuring clouds in the disk of the Milky Way.
	The central few hundred parsecs in near-infrared light: what a difference! We see through most of the dust to get an impression of what the galaxy is really like. (2MASS Project, http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/gallery/showcase/allsky_stars/fullres.html)
	A bit farther into the infrared cuts through the dust even better and shows the center more clearly. (from NASA/JPL-Caltech/S. Stolovy (Spitzer Science Center)