How Life Formed on the Earth
Key points: Earliest life; critical steps toward life; RNA and DNA; evolution
Life probably couldn't have formed during the bombardment as the earth assembled from infalling asteroids.
|Early stages of formation of Earth; much of the surface is still
molten, by David Hardy
|A bit later, with a solidified surface but still the bombardment continues, by Don Dixon|
|We can judge the rate from the cratering of the moon -- erosion has not erased all the traces of this episode there, as it has on the earth. The bombardment was very intense up to about 4 billion years ago. (illustration adapted by G. Rieke, after J. & C. Lunine, "Earth") In fact, there is evidence that an intense "aftershock" of large impacts resurfaced the moon around 3.9 billion years ago (an event not shown to the left). If this aftershock really occurred, just during that episode, the earth might have experienced as many as 1700 events powerful enough to leave craters larger than 20 km in diameter and capable of widespread havoc and extinction.|
|Despite this bombardment, very
primitive life had already formed by 3.5 billion years ago. To the
left are microbacteria fossils of this age (used as the standard against which to judge
the claims for microbacteria in the meteorite from Mars). (J. W. Schopf, http://www.astrobiology.ucla.edu/)
|At a site in NW Australia (left), a bed of
3.5 billion year old stromatolite fossils has been discovered (below left). (W.
Aust. Petroleum, http://www.dme.wa.gov.au/ancientfossils/)
|(W. Aust. Petroleum, http://www.dme.wa.gov.au/ancientfossils/)|
|Stromatolites are an organization of primitive cyanobacteria (lower left) into large-scale structures that might have been analogous to coral reefs or "pond scum"(Worldwide Museum Nat. Hist., http://www.wmnh.com/wmel0000.htm, U. Cal. Mus. Paleontology, http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/bacteria/cyanofr.html|
|Fossil stromatolites can be identified through a characteristic layering that results from the growth patterns of their constituent bacteria.(Worldwide Museum Nat. Hist., http://www.wmnh.com/wmel0000.htm B. G. Sutton http://www.lakeneosho.org/More7.html)|
|Artist's concept (painting by Peter Sawyer, copyright Smithsonian Institution) of early stromatolites on a beach 3.5 billion years ago, from http://www.wf.carleton.ca/Museum/camex/1darchean.html||There are a few surviving living beds of these most primitive life forms still in Australia and a few other places.(from J. Vicens http://www-ecpm.u-strasbg.fr/Actu/A-curious/a-c-stromato.html) (more have been found in a number of other places, too)|
So, Life formed quickly! How?
|After the initial impact bombardment, the
surface of the earth must have quickly established conditions similar enough to the
current ones for life to form. The heat from assembly of the planet would result in much
more volcanic action, however, and typical volcanic gases would be expelled into the
atmosphere: carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen, water vapor. it is generally
believed that the convection in the mantle would be too strong for plate tectonics. Once
the water vapor had condensed into oceans, they would have covered most of the surface,
with vigorous volcano eruptions below the surface and occasionally a volcanic island
sticking above it.Ultraviolet radiation from the young sun was much more intense than now,
and the gases then in the atmosphere would have done little to shield the surface.
Moon setting on early Earth, Don Dixon.
Formation of simple bacteria does not sound like much of a feat, but it requires climbing many difficult chemical steps in this environment. We have only a vague understanding of most of these steps. The two basic ones are to harness chemical energy - life is dead without energy - and to be able to make copies of oneself - life dies out without copies to carry on the strain. Here are some of the details behind these steps:
1. Form amino acids
A classic experiment in 1953 has dominated thinking about how amino acids might have formed
|Stanley Miller used a mixture of chemicals and electric sparks, and produced amino acids readily in the laboratory. (L. E. Orgel, http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/2948/orgel.html). However, it is now realized that the atmosphere was more likely to be dominated by gases with very different chemical behavior than those Miller used, and with these gases the experiment does not work. Still, Miller's experiment is rightly recognized for its pioneering of a whole new class of investigation - how to create some of the preconditions for life in the laboratory.|
Fortunately, it turns out to be pretty easy to make amino acids in other ways. For example, they should have formed in the hot sea vents where volcanoes were erupting. More curiously, they are observed in interstellar clouds, and they have also been created in the laboratory with experiments that recreate the conditions in interstellar gas clouds where stars form. It is possible that they were created in this way external to Earth and brought to the planet in the rain of interstellar material that has continued (although diminished) from its birth to the present. It is likely that life formed from combining molecules that developed in all these ways. Good! We seem to have a number of ways of getting started.
2.) Make molecules that can harness energy and replicate themselves
Amino acids are relatively simple. They have none of the aspects of life - they are just raw materials, like bricks for a skyscraper. Given the complexity of what had to happen next, it is not surprising that it has eluded us almost completely. C. DeDuve (Vital Dust) suggests that it should be to harness energy, by building complex molecules that can store chemical energy and release it through chemical reactions (these reactions are called fermentation and, yes, the process that converts sugars to drinking alcohol is one of them). The other key to making life is to form molecules from amino acids that "replicate" themselves, that is, encourage the formation of identical molecules to themselves. As soon as we have molecules that harness energy and can make copies of themselves, we set in motion the "natural selection" engine. The molecules that survive well in a given environment will stay around to make more replicas of themselves, and will come to dominate the chemicals in that environment.
|Proteins - made of amino acids - are the main building material for living organisms but cannot reproduce. RNA (ribonucleic acid) was essential for that function. RNA organizes itself into long strings that encode a sequence of proteins, giving the plans for an organism, and can duplicate itself to allow new copies of the organism to be produced. To the right, an RNA molecule. (from Morehead Planetarium and Science Center http://www.moreheadplanetarium.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=page&filename=dna_preview.html)|
The first very primitive organisms would have been too small and fragile to last for long. Although RNA is a very complex molecule, it had to be "invented" quickly to be successful at all. Nonetheless, it has proven difficult to produce primitive RNA through experiments analogous to Miller's, so our understanding of this key step is not very complete. One idea is that some predecessor to RNA that was simpler, but still able to replicate, must have been created first. For example, one proposal is that clays acted as a kind of template that produced RNA-like molecules - a possibility that seems to be supported by some laboratory experiments.
Once RNA had formed, we had life (albeit of a very primitive nature)!
RNA replication still has a fairly high error rate, perhaps 1%, which limits the complexity of chains that can reproduce. A specialized molecule eventually developed, DNA, which replicates far more accurately. The replication process with either RNA or DNA is an incredible feat of organic chemistry. It is built around phosphate and sugar molecules, that give DNA its structural "backbone", and four molecular appendages onto sugars, nucleotides, that carry the information: adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine
|The famous "double helix" structure of DNA is a result of the most efficient mechanical packing of the molecule. Far more interesting is that every sequence of three nucleotides encodes instructions for making a unique protein molecule, of the 20 proteins that are used as the building blocks of life. When scientists "decoded" the human genome, they determined the string of proteins spelled out by human DNA.|
A string of DNA acts as a template for producing another string that is its "negative", that is has the same encoding but with each nucleotide replaced with its "complement": adenine for thymine and thymine for adenine, and cytonine for guanine and guanine for cytonine. The process occurs in water and begins when the complements are attracted to the DNA nucleotides by "polar" bonds. A polar bond is created by the weak electrical asymmetries in a molecule, not by the normal process of sharing electrons between atoms. The chemical reactions are assisted by a polymerase, a molecule that moves along the DNA and somehow helps the new DNA assemble correctly. Once the new DNA is complete, it can detach from the old one by the breaking of those polar bonds - they act like a perforated line in a sheet of paper that allows a form to be torn off after it has been filled out according to the instructions. The animation below gives an idea of the whole process
The DNA in each cell of an organism contains the full set of instructions for making a new organism (with the important exception of sexual reproduction to be discussed soon). If the DNA in a human cell were laid out as a single string, it would be about as long as the height of the human and would contain about a billion bytes of information (in computer parlance).
3.) Build Cells
|All this complex chemistry will proceed more easily if it is walled
off from interference. The first cells must have developed for this reason - thin
molecular walls that kept the "outside" out. The thin walls of the cells turned
out to have many other uses for regulating chemical reactions, as more sophisticated life
forms evolved . (from http://ghs.gresham.k12.or.us/science/ps/sci/soph/cells/celltheory.htm)
Errors are the Key!
From time to time an error will be made in the replication; these changes are called "mutations." If the modified molecule can no longer replicate itself, or if it cannot survive well in the environment, the error will be a dead end. Once in a great while, a replication error may lead to a molecule that survives better than its "parent" molecule, and if it can still replicate itself as well, it will eventually dominate the chemical environment. We can't expect this kind of luck to strike very often, but if we have enough replicating molecules it will happen once in a great while, and the result will be a slow transition toward more "competitive" molecules - generally, ones that have additional features to allow them to contend with environmental challenges. This process of competition drove primitive forms of life to ever more robust forms that could survive and reproduce more efficiently than the previous ones. In millions of generations, there were many chances for improvements and the result was a rapid increase in the sophistication of the life forms.
4.) Make Food
|Although the very first life forms must have derived energy by
fermentation of organic chemicals, a huge advance came when higher-grade energy sources -
sugars - could be manufactured from the energy of the sun, photosynthesis. http://www.historyoftheuniverse.com/photosyn.html
The cyanobacteria that make stromatolites are examples of the products of these four steps; they have cells containing DNA for reproduction and making energy by means of photosynthesis.
Does this chain of events leading to primitive life occur often? Or is life on earth a rare phenomenon? When we think of finding life on other worlds, we are more interested in advanced life than in bacteria
The question of how hard it is for life to form would be answered -- that it forms easily -- if we could find life that formed somewhere else. Hence the great interest (besides science fiction) in whether there is or ever was life on Mars.
Life on Mars has held a fascination for us for many years
The Viking Mission in 1976 placed two landers on Mars.
|A picture sent back by a Viking lander showing its arm, which scooped up soil for testing:|
|Picture of a Viking lander before launch (far left)
Another view of the terrain near a Viking lander -- note how rocky it is! (left)
Viking performed the following searches for life:
In the end, all the experiments gave no evidence for life.
Thanks to John Martinac
But this evidence from Viking refers to now. Could Mars have had life in the past?
-- Recall geologic evidence for running water on Mars early in its history (e.g. ~ 3 billion years ago).
|During this period, a meteor was blasted from the surface of Mars by an impact, and then wandered in interplanetary space until it happened to come too close to the earth, which captured it. The Martian meteorite provided intriguing clues of both organic materials and possible bacteria fossils.|
However, eventually it was shown that the structures could have originated by geological processes. The appropriately scientifically skeptical point of view is that the evidence is not strong enough to conclude that life is responsible for the structures on the meteorite. (From A. Zabludoff, http://atropos.as.arizona.edu/aiz/teaching/nats102/lecture1.html) Still, the subject is not entirely closed - scientists still debate what the structures are and whether they provide evidence for life.
Mars is the most accessible place other than Earth where life may have formed; expect continued reports!
Test your understanding before going on
From Chronicle of Higher Education
Diorama of early complex life (Ediacaran), from Smithsonian
Click to return to syllabus
|Click to return to Habitable Zones||
hypertext G. H. Rieke
Click to go to Advanced Life